LTC Rules
https://doptcirculars.nic.in/OM/ViewOM.aspx?id=479&headid=8
Part - 1
Part - 2
Part - 3
Case Study: Complexities in LTC Eligibility and Usage Based on Special Provisions
Scenario:
Mr. Ramesh Verma, a newly recruited Central Government employee, seeks to avail of LTC benefits to visit his hometown after completing one year of service. He belongs to a category specified under Rule 2(1), and his administrative authority has certified that he is likely to continue his service for at least two years. However, the following complications arise:
Contract-Based Appointment:
Mr. Verma was initially appointed on a one-year contract, which was later extended by another year.
Family Composition:
His family includes his wife, one minor unmarried daughter, and his widowed mother, who resides separately but is wholly dependent on him.
Previous Service and Dependency Rules:
Mr. Verma was re-employed after retiring from another government department, where he had availed of LTC benefits to visit a place in India during the previous block period.
Multiple Births:
During his re-employment, Mr. Verma had twins (resulting from a single childbirth), raising questions about the restriction of LTC to two surviving children.
Booking Tickets:
He planned to visit his hometown in the northeastern region under the special LTC scheme, but he booked tickets through a private travel portal instead of an authorized agent.
Analysis of Issues Based on Rules:
Contract-Based Appointment:
Rule: As per Rule 2(2), for contract-based employees, the total duration of the contract is considered for LTC eligibility.
Hidden Fact: Mr. Verma is eligible for LTC benefits since his contract extension implies continuous service for more than one year.
Family Composition:
Rule: As per Rule 4(d), the family includes a government servant’s spouse, unmarried dependent children, and dependent parents, even if they reside separately.
Hidden Fact: His widowed mother qualifies as a family member for LTC since she is wholly dependent on him, regardless of her separate residence.
Previous Service and Dependency Rules:
Rule: As per Rule 2(3), the re-employed period is treated as continuous with previous service for LTC purposes. However, LTC benefits already availed during the previous block cannot be used again.
Hidden Fact: Mr. Verma cannot claim LTC benefits to a place in India during the current block if he already availed of this concession in his previous service before retirement.
Multiple Births:
Rule: As per Rule 4(d)(1)(iii), the restriction on LTC to two surviving children does not apply in cases of multiple births from a second childbirth.
Hidden Fact: Both of Mr. Verma’s twins are eligible for LTC benefits since they resulted from a single childbirth.
Booking Tickets:
Rule: As per LTC rules, tickets for special LTC schemes (e.g., northeastern region) must be booked through authorized agents such as Balmer Lawrie, Ashok Travels & Tours, or IRCTC.
Hidden Fact: His claim will be rejected because tickets booked through a private travel portal are not reimbursable under the rules.
Recommendations for Mr. Verma:
Eligibility Certification:
Ensure that the administrative authority certifies his eligibility for LTC, including the likely continuation of service for at least two years.
Dependents' Documentation:
Submit dependency certificates for his widowed mother and twins to avoid disputes regarding their inclusion as family members under LTC rules.
Avoid Duplicate Claims:
Avoid applying for LTC benefits to any place in India if he already availed of the same during his previous service. Instead, he can opt for a hometown LTC.
Proper Ticket Booking:
Rebook tickets through an authorized travel agent to comply with LTC rules for special schemes.
Plan for Future Block Periods:
Utilize LTC benefits judiciously for the current block and plan appropriately for the next block period to avoid last-minute complications.
Conclusion:
Mr. Verma’s case highlights the intricacies of LTC rules, especially for employees with special circumstances such as re-employment, contract-based service, and unique family situations. Adherence to booking guidelines, proper documentation of family dependency, and awareness of LTC restrictions are crucial for a seamless LTC experience.
Case Study: Unveiling Hidden Facts About Leave Travel Concession (LTC)
Scenario:
Mr. Rajesh Kumar, a Central Government employee, plans to avail of LTC for a family trip to the Andaman & Nicobar Islands. He is entitled to economy-class air travel, and his family comprises his spouse and two children. Rajesh is confused about the following aspects:
Whether his children are eligible for LTC reimbursement.
If he can claim reimbursement for flight tickets booked through an online travel portal instead of authorized agents.
The possibility of carrying forward LTC for future use.
Whether he can combine LTC with leave for personal reasons.
Reimbursement rules if his wife travels to a different destination.
Analysis of the Hidden Facts:
Eligibility for Children:
As per LTC rules, children below the age of 25 years are eligible for reimbursement if they are dependent on the employee and not earning an independent income.
Hidden Fact: Rajesh needs to provide documentation (e.g., age proof and dependency declaration) to ensure reimbursement for his children.
Booking Flight Tickets:
Government employees traveling to Andaman & Nicobar Islands under the special dispensation scheme must book tickets through authorized agents (Balmer Lawrie, Ashok Travels & Tours, or IRCTC).
Hidden Fact: Booking through an unauthorized platform will disqualify the claim, even if the ticket price is lower.
Carrying Forward LTC:
Employees can carry forward unused LTC benefits within the same block period (e.g., from 2022-2023 to 2024-2025).
Hidden Fact: Rajesh cannot carry forward the benefit beyond the block period unless an extension is officially announced.
Combining LTC with Leave:
LTC can be availed during any form of leave, such as casual leave or earned leave.
Hidden Fact: Rajesh must ensure that the leave sanctioned aligns with the LTC journey to avoid disputes during reimbursement.
Different Destinations for Family Members:
Family members can travel to different destinations as long as it is within the same LTC block and the trips meet eligibility criteria.
Hidden Fact: Rajesh’s wife’s travel will only be reimbursed if it adheres to the prescribed guidelines, and documentation must reflect separate claims.
Recommendations for Rajesh:
Verify Dependency Documents:
Collect birth certificates and dependency declarations for his children to avoid delays in processing.
Book Through Authorized Agents:
Ensure flight tickets are booked through Balmer Lawrie, Ashok Travels & Tours, or IRCTC for eligibility.
Plan Within Block Period:
Avail of the LTC benefit for the current block or formally request a carry-forward if eligible.
Align Leave and Travel Dates:
Seek approval for leave that coincides with the LTC journey to ensure seamless reimbursement.
Document Family Travel:
Provide a clear itinerary and separate claims for family members traveling to different destinations.
Conclusion:
By understanding the hidden aspects of LTC, Rajesh can avoid common pitfalls such as unauthorized bookings, incomplete documentation, or misalignment with block periods. Careful planning and adherence to rules will ensure a hassle-free experience.
Case Study: Complex LTC Application and Violation of Rules
Scenario:
Mrs. Meera Sharma, a Central Government employee, applied for LTC on the last day of the eligible block period. She combined the LTC journey with medical leave, which is not directly applicable under LTC rules, and planned the trip for her spouse and two children. She submitted her claim two months after the journey, and the following issues arose:
Last-Day Application:
The leave sanctioning authority raised concerns about the validity of the LTC application made on the last day of the block period.
Combination with Inapplicable Leave:
Mrs. Sharma combined LTC with medical leave, which does not fall under the permissible leave types for LTC purposes.
Delayed Claim Submission:
As per LTC rules, the claim must be submitted within three months of the journey. Her claim exceeded this period.
Booking Tickets Through Unauthorized Platforms:
Mrs. Sharma booked flight tickets for her family through an online travel portal, which is not an authorized agent under the special LTC scheme.
Family Members Traveling Separately:
Her spouse and children traveled to a different destination, but she did not provide separate tickets and boarding passes, leading to partial rejection of the claim.
Analysis of Violations and Rules:
Last-Day Application:
Rule: LTC applications should ideally be submitted well in advance to allow processing and sanctioning of leave. Applying on the last day is risky and may be rejected due to insufficient time for verification.
Hidden Fact: The employer may consider the claim valid if leave is sanctioned retrospectively, but such approvals are rare.
Combination with Medical Leave:
Rule: LTC can be combined with casual leave, earned leave, or special casual leave, but not medical leave or extraordinary leave unless exceptional circumstances are approved by the competent authority.
Hidden Fact: Mrs. Sharma’s LTC claim might be rejected unless she provides strong justification for combining LTC with medical leave.
Delayed Claim Submission:
Rule: LTC claims must be submitted within three months of completing the journey. Delayed claims require special approval from the department head, which is not guaranteed.
Hidden Fact: The claim can still be processed under exceptional circumstances if Mrs. Sharma provides a valid reason for the delay.
Unauthorized Ticket Booking:
Rule: For travel under special LTC schemes (e.g., Northeast, J&K, Andaman & Nicobar Islands), tickets must be booked through Balmer Lawrie, Ashok Travels & Tours, or IRCTC.
Hidden Fact: Claims for tickets booked through unauthorized agents are automatically rejected, even if cheaper options are used.
Family Members Traveling Separately:
Rule: Family members can travel separately, but documentation (e.g., tickets, boarding passes, and itineraries) must be submitted for each member.
Hidden Fact: Lack of proper documentation for separate claims often leads to partial or full rejection of the claim.
Resolution:
Rectify Leave Application:
Mrs. Sharma must seek retrospective approval for combining LTC with medical leave, providing a medical certificate as justification.
Provide Detailed Explanation for Delayed Submission:
Submit a formal request explaining the delay in claim submission, accompanied by supporting documents. The approving authority may condone the delay in exceptional cases.
Rebook Tickets Through Authorized Agents (If Possible):
If the journey is yet to be undertaken, rebook tickets through authorized platforms. If already completed, appeal to the department for a waiver, though approval is unlikely.
Submit Complete Documentation for Family Travel:
Provide separate tickets, boarding passes, and itineraries for her spouse and children. Include dependency declarations for the children.
Plan for Future Compliance:
Avoid combining LTC with inapplicable leaves and ensure proper planning to adhere to LTC block periods and submission timelines.
Conclusion:
Mrs. Sharma’s case highlights the importance of adhering to LTC guidelines regarding leave types, ticket bookings, documentation, and timely submission. To avoid such situations, employees must thoroughly understand the rules and plan LTC journeys well in advance. This case emphasizes the need for meticulous documentation and proactive communication with the sanctioning authority.
Case Study: LTC Application in Complex Scenarios
Scenario: Mrs. Shalini Gupta, a Central Government employee, encounters multiple LTC-related situations during her service:
Marriage and Hometown Travel:
Shalini, while on LTC to her hometown, gets married. Her husband wishes to travel from the hometown to her headquarters to join her.
Leave Preparatory to Retirement:
She plans to retire in the next four months and wishes to use LTC to visit her hometown and an additional place in India during her preparatory leave.
Family Residing in a Different Location:
Her dependent children live with her parents in Mumbai, while her headquarters are in Delhi. She plans to bring them to Delhi for a family reunion using LTC.
Hometown Declaration:
Shalini initially declared her hometown as Kanpur but later wishes to change it to Lucknow due to exceptional circumstances.
Shortest Route Dispute:
While booking tickets for her LTC journey, she opts for a longer route to avail of a scenic train ride, raising concerns about reimbursement for travel expenses.
Analysis of Issues Based on Rules:
Marriage and Hometown Travel:
Rule: A female government servant who gets married during LTC to her hometown is entitled to LTC benefits for her husband's travel from the hometown to her headquarters. Similarly, a newly married wife traveling from her hometown to the husband's headquarters is allowed.
Resolution: Shalini's husband is eligible for LTC reimbursement for his travel from the hometown to her headquarters. Shalini should provide a marriage certificate and journey details for claim processing.
Leave Preparatory to Retirement:
Rule: LTC can be availed to visit both the hometown (in a two-year block) and a place in India (in a four-year block) during leave preparatory to retirement, provided the return journey is completed before the leave ends.
Resolution: Shalini must ensure her travel plans are finalized within the preparatory leave period. She can claim both LTC trips separately if the conditions are met.
Family Residing in a Different Location:
Rule: When a government servant’s family resides at a location different from their headquarters, LTC can be availed for their journey from the family’s residence to the headquarters or hometown. Full reimbursement is allowed for family journeys to the headquarters and back.
Resolution: Shalini’s children can travel from Mumbai to Delhi and back under LTC rules. She should ensure proper documentation, including tickets and proof of dependency.
Hometown Declaration:
Rule: A hometown, once declared and accepted, is final but can be changed under exceptional circumstances with HoD approval. This change is allowed only once during a government servant’s career.
Resolution: Shalini should submit a formal request for changing her hometown to Lucknow, citing valid reasons. Approval from her HoD will be required.
Shortest Route Dispute:
Rule: LTC reimbursement is limited to travel via the shortest direct route as per Supplementary Rule 30. Longer routes may be taken, but the claim will be restricted to the cost of the shortest route.
Resolution: Shalini can take the scenic route but should expect reimbursement only for the shortest route’s equivalent cost. She should calculate the expense difference in advance.
Recommendations for Shalini:
Documentation for Marriage Travel:
Submit her marriage certificate, husband’s travel details, and tickets for a smooth LTC claim process.
Plan Retirement LTC Trips:
Ensure both LTC journeys (hometown and any place in India) are completed before her preparatory leave ends.
Proof for Family Dependency:
Provide dependency certificates and children’s travel details for LTC reimbursement for their journey from Mumbai to Delhi and back.
Request for Hometown Change:
Prepare a clear justification for changing her hometown to Lucknow and submit it to the HoD with supporting documents.
Choose Shortest Route Wisely:
For future LTC trips, prioritize the shortest route for full reimbursement unless scenic travel is personally important, accepting partial reimbursement.
Conclusion:
Mrs. Shalini Gupta’s case demonstrates the interplay of rules concerning marital travel, retirement provisions, family location, hometown declaration, and route selection. Proper planning, adherence to guidelines, and timely documentation can ensure a smooth LTC experience, even in complex scenarios.
Case Study: Navigating LTC Rules for Reimbursement
Scenario:
Mr. Rajesh Kumar, a Central Government employee, applies for LTC to visit a declared place of visit in the northeastern region of India. His travel involves multiple complexities, and he submits a claim for reimbursement with the following elements:
Multi-Class Travel by Rail:
Rajesh and his family travel by a longer route, using First AC for part of the journey and Second AC for the rest.
Concessional Circular Tour Ticket:
They avail of a circular tour ticket offered by Indian Railways and combine it with LTC.
E-Ticket Booking:
Rajesh books all tickets online via the Indian Railways website.
Catering Charges:
He opts for catering services on trains for himself and his family.
Private Transport Usage:
From the nearest railway station, Rajesh hires a private taxi to cover a 150-km journey to the declared place of visit.
Cancellation Charges:
Due to a change in plans, he cancels one set of air tickets for a family member who initially intended to join but later withdrew.
Submission of Claims:
Rajesh submits his LTC claim late, 20 days after the journey, citing delays in gathering the necessary documents.
Analysis Based on Rules:
Multi-Class Travel by Rail:
Rule: Reimbursement is allowed at the entitled class rate for the shortest route. For travel in different classes, the entitled class rate applies proportionately to the shortest route.
Resolution: Rajesh will be reimbursed for the First AC and Second AC fares based on their proportion of the shortest route distance, regardless of the longer route taken.
Concessional Circular Tour Ticket:
Rule: Reimbursement is based on normal fares for the shortest route between the headquarters and the declared place of visit.
Resolution: Rajesh’s claim will be adjusted to reflect the normal fare for the shortest route, not the concessional rate.
E-Ticket Booking:
Rule: Booking through the Indian Railways website is reimbursable.
Resolution: Rajesh’s claim for online booking charges is valid and will be reimbursed.
Catering Charges:
Rule: Catering charges for eligible trains are reimbursable.
Resolution: Catering charges incurred by Rajesh for himself and his family are reimbursable.
Private Transport Usage:
Rule: When public transport is unavailable, reimbursement is allowed for a maximum of 200 km (100 km each way) based on self-certification.
Resolution: Rajesh’s taxi journey of 150 km falls within the reimbursable limit. He should submit a self-certification to support his claim.
Cancellation Charges:
Rule: Cancellation charges by airlines and authorized travel agents are reimbursable only on account of official exigencies.
Resolution: Since the cancellation was due to personal reasons, Rajesh cannot claim reimbursement for these charges.
Late Submission of Claims:
Rule: Processing time limits for LTC claims are clearly defined. Delay in submission may lead to delays in reimbursement.
Resolution: Rajesh should provide a valid reason for the delay and ensure all supporting documents are complete to expedite processing.
Recommendations for Rajesh:
Document Proportional Travel:
Clearly mention the distance traveled in different classes and the corresponding ticket costs to avoid disputes.
Provide Self-Certification:
Submit a self-certification for the private taxi journey, specifying the unavailability of public transport.
Avoid Last-Minute Changes:
Plan travel for all family members to minimize cancellations and related financial loss.
Timely Submission:
Adhere to the time limits for LTC claim submission to avoid unnecessary processing delays.
Conclusion:
Mr. Rajesh Kumar’s case highlights the importance of adhering to LTC rules regarding route selection, class entitlement, booking methods, and claims processing. By maintaining thorough documentation and complying with guidelines, he can ensure smoother processing and maximum reimbursement under LTC.